Strategic Sourcing: From Periphery to the Core
When should you create a capability within your own company compared to when should you outsource? For family- and home-based businesses, I favor growth by outsourcing lower value-added processes or capabilities rather than growing by adding employees to the mix (see previous posts on that topic here and here.) In addition to the issue of mixing outside of employees with family is the strategic issue when to build vs. buy a capability. What I always advised my Fortune 500 clients while I was at the Boston Consulting Group was as follows: create, nurture and protect the capabilities that are strategic or core to your business, but outsource and monitor the capabilities that are not strategic and therefore not core to your business. Most well-managed companies are very good at narrowing their focus and they are well-known for a particular capability. Compare that thinking with a company that is only mediocre at several capabilities. So what exactly is "core" or strategic to a company in terms of capabilities? The article extract below sheds more light on this type of thinking...
The Idea
Almost nothing a company does can’t be outsourced anymore—even functions as critical as engineering, marketing, and manufacturing. Yet only 6% of the companies that outsource are satisfied with the practice. Why? Too many managers make outsourcing decisions piecemeal. They focus on incremental cost improvements rather than taking a strategic view of capability sourcing.
With strategic capability sourcing, you don’t assume that your company’s most vital capabilities must remain in-house. Credit-card giant American Express, for example, outsourced its crucial transaction processing function when it no longer provided proprietary advantage.
To source capabilities strategically, you must also decide which partners can best perform which capabilities. Rather than selecting suppliers based only on cost, for example, Chrysler consolidated component purchases with several suppliers it believed could sustain competitive costs, high quality, and efficient delivery.
And if your company’s the best at a particular capability, consider making it an entirely new business—as UPS does by providing logistics management to other companies.
The right capability sourcing strategy can translate into industry dominance: Strategic outsourcer 7-Eleven consistently beats other retailers in same-store merchandise growth, revenue per employee, and inventory turn rate.
The Idea in Practice
To develop your capability sourcing strategy, apply these steps:
Identify your business’s “core of the core”. These are activities your company does better and cheaper than rivals. For 7-Eleven, they are product ordering and in-store merchandising—the pricing, positioning, and promotion of ready-to-eat food, gasoline, and sundries for car-driving consumers.
Decide what to outsource. Consider two factors:
Proprietary value: A capability has high proprietary value if your company executes it in a way that generates measurably more value than competitors could, and if your company would suffer major strategic damage if rivals imitated the capability. Commonality: A capability has high commonality if outside suppliers can achieve scale or other advantages by providing it to many others in your industry.Your strongest candidates for outsourcing? Capabilities that have low proprietary value and high commonality.
Example: 7-Eleven decided to outsource human resources, finance, IT management, logistics, distribution, product development, and packaging to outside partners with greater expertise and scale in these capabilities.
Decide what to insource. For capabilities your company excels at, consider “insourcing”—turning them into new businesses by performing this function for other companies. FedEx positioned itself at the leading edge of the $225 billion logistics-outsourcing industry by planning and managing inbound transportation for more than 1,500 product suppliers into 26 General Motors power train facilities.
Decide how to outsource. Compare each of your outsource-worthy capabilities’ cost and quality to those of top-performing rivals or suppliers. Use these comparisons to define outsourcing relationships:
Outsource high-cost and unnecessarily high-quality capabilities to low-cost providers—even if that means some reduction in quality. Outsource high-cost, low-quality capabilities to partners who can reduce costs and boost quality.Also structure each outsourcing partnership differently, depending on each capability’s importance to your company’s competitive distinctiveness.
Example: 7-Eleven has outsourced all routine capabilities (such as benefits administration and accounts payable) to providers that can consistently fulfill cost and quality requirements. For more strategic capabilities, it makes more complex arrangements. For instance, the firm outsources gasoline distribution to Citgo but maintains proprietary control over gas pricing and promotion—activities that could differentiate its stores if done well.
By: Mark Gottfredson, Rudy Puryear, and Stephen Phillips
Source: Harvard Business Review
- June 13, 2008
- Operations
Please login to post a comment.
Member Log In
Register Now
Register now to gain access to all of the resources available on our site. Basic membership is free!